Comment received December 30, 2009 from David Martindale via email
message ID 4b3be309.4801be0a.056d.ffff9571@mx.google.com:

It seems to me that, by the rules of fair play, there should at least be a footnote pointing out that not one of the named testimonial experts was precluded from testifying (indirectly suggesting that the allegations appearing in [opposing counsel Robin Yeaman's] Motion were unconvincing to the court). Evidence that the court did give thoughtful consideration to Robin's Motion can be seen in the removal of Jon Gould, the non-testimonial expert.